<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MIM&#8217;s Review of &#8220;Living La Utopia&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://annaaniston.blogsome.com/2006/09/27/mims-review-of-living-la-utopia/</link>
	<description>adventures of an anarchic anarchista</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: genda-killa</title>
		<link>http://annaaniston.blogsome.com/2006/09/27/mims-review-of-living-la-utopia/#comment-244</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 05:02:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://annaaniston.blogsome.com/2006/09/27/mims-review-of-living-la-utopia/#comment-244</guid>
					<description>&quot;#

Attractiveness to the lumpenproletariat

    * (this only really highlights MIM’s own bigotry against those elements of the proletariat who aren’t opised to become a ‘red bourgeoise’)&quot;

I don't know what you mean here. MIM says the best class to go with in the first world is the lumpen-proletariat. MIM says there is no first world proletariat. 

MIM, whether you disagree with them or not, are by far the most scientific  &quot;leftists&quot; out there. They are incredibly advanced. Just read their gender theory. Nobody knocks over idols like MIM. Check out irtr.org also, there are some real interesting Maoists there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;#</p>
	<p>Attractiveness to the lumpenproletariat</p>
	<pre><code>* (this only really highlights MIM’s own bigotry against those elements of the proletariat who aren’t opised to become a ‘red bourgeoise’)\"
</code></pre>
	<p>I don&#8217;t know what you mean here. MIM says the best class to go with in the first world is the lumpen-proletariat. MIM says there is no first world proletariat. </p>
	<p>MIM, whether you disagree with them or not, are by far the most scientific  &#8220;leftists&#8221; out there. They are incredibly advanced. Just read their gender theory. Nobody knocks over idols like MIM. Check out irtr.org also, there are some real interesting Maoists there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anna Aniston</title>
		<link>http://annaaniston.blogsome.com/2006/09/27/mims-review-of-living-la-utopia/#comment-243</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 05:27:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://annaaniston.blogsome.com/2006/09/27/mims-review-of-living-la-utopia/#comment-243</guid>
					<description>Dear Molly, thanks for sharing your cool analysis with myself and my readers. You rock!

I find the delusions of the left sometimes more frustrating than the delusions of the right. This constant searching after heroes is absolutely futile and only serves to deny our right to self-determination. Like hello? Why do leninist / trotskyist /stalinist organisations use hero worship? Its to control and limit people's autonomy. 

Anyways...

I really wish I had been able to finish this piece when I started it (last year) - but life took over. Perhaps I'll give it another go. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dear Molly, thanks for sharing your cool analysis with myself and my readers. You rock!</p>
	<p>I find the delusions of the left sometimes more frustrating than the delusions of the right. This constant searching after heroes is absolutely futile and only serves to deny our right to self-determination. Like hello? Why do leninist / trotskyist /stalinist organisations use hero worship? Its to control and limit people&#8217;s autonomy. </p>
	<p>Anyways&#8230;</p>
	<p>I really wish I had been able to finish this piece when I started it (last year) - but life took over. Perhaps I&#8217;ll give it another go. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mollymew</title>
		<link>http://annaaniston.blogsome.com/2006/09/27/mims-review-of-living-la-utopia/#comment-242</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:24:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://annaaniston.blogsome.com/2006/09/27/mims-review-of-living-la-utopia/#comment-242</guid>
					<description>I don't know if Maoists are the best source for anything, let alone a critical analysis of the faults of anarchism.      
I'd tend to agree with at least some of the faults that you have ennumerated and add others.     
The greatest fault !!! that I can see is the tendency for anarchists to try and create their own little self contained world,     
and if there is one political cult that are grand masters of this fault it is the Maoists.     
    
Anyways, I notice that your site contains links to platformist sites. These are definitely &quot;structured&quot; anarchist      
organizations, though &quot;highly disciplined&quot; they are not. The Spanish anarchists failed not because they were too &quot;undisciplined     
and unstructured&quot; but for the very opposite reason. The membership endured the poor choices of the leadership out of an     
extreme! self dicipline born from organizational loyalty.     
    
All the matters of criminality can be summed up by the way that marginal movements look for Robin Hood figures where none     
actually exist. In the USA, and to a lesser extent Canada, anarchism's minority love affair with criminality descends from an    
 undigested reverence for decades of Maoist !! clowns who covered their criminal acts with a thin veneer of politics.     
     
This sort of posturing doesn't feature in the actions of anarchists who actually have an effect in the real world     
such as the present day Spanish CGT or even the present CNT.     
    
Anyways, I enjoy your blog, and I have added it to the links on mine. I stole your 'A Selection of Modern Anarchist Writings by     Women' to add to my online libraries section of links. In return you might like to steal the following collection of Emma Goldman's     
ritings to add to yours:      
http://womenshistory.about.com/od/goldmanewriting     
Take care,     
Molly    


*Edited by Anna to fit on the page properly*      
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t know if Maoists are the best source for anything, let alone a critical analysis of the faults of anarchism.<br />
I&#8217;d tend to agree with at least some of the faults that you have ennumerated and add others.<br />
The greatest fault !!! that I can see is the tendency for anarchists to try and create their own little self contained world,<br />
and if there is one political cult that are grand masters of this fault it is the Maoists.     </p>
	<p>Anyways, I notice that your site contains links to platformist sites. These are definitely &#8220;structured&#8221; anarchist<br />
organizations, though &#8220;highly disciplined&#8221; they are not. The Spanish anarchists failed not because they were too &#8220;undisciplined<br />
and unstructured&#8221; but for the very opposite reason. The membership endured the poor choices of the leadership out of an<br />
extreme! self dicipline born from organizational loyalty.     </p>
	<p>All the matters of criminality can be summed up by the way that marginal movements look for Robin Hood figures where none<br />
actually exist. In the USA, and to a lesser extent Canada, anarchism&#8217;s minority love affair with criminality descends from an<br />
 undigested reverence for decades of Maoist !! clowns who covered their criminal acts with a thin veneer of politics.     </p>
	<p>This sort of posturing doesn&#8217;t feature in the actions of anarchists who actually have an effect in the real world<br />
such as the present day Spanish CGT or even the present CNT.     </p>
	<p>Anyways, I enjoy your blog, and I have added it to the links on mine. I stole your &#8216;A Selection of Modern Anarchist Writings by     Women&#8217; to add to my online libraries section of links. In return you might like to steal the following collection of Emma Goldman&#8217;s<br />
ritings to add to yours:<br />
<a href='http://womenshistory.about.com/od/goldmanewriting' rel='nofollow'>http://womenshistory.about.com/od/goldmanewriting</a><br />
Take care,<br />
Molly    </p>
	<p><em>Edited by Anna to fit on the page properly</em>      </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
