National anarchism - why would you?
How can National anarchism exist? How can people reject hierarchy, rules, authority and endeavour to live peaceully as equals with one qualifier: race.
This is as badly though-out and insane as “anarcho capitalism” - a bizarre ideology that promulgates a myth of employer freedoms. Like, hello, open your fucking eyes! Employers already enjoy so many freedoms that as a working class anarchist, I’m thankful to have a state to protect my last shreds of dignity (even though I’d love to be smashing that state into pieces).
This is even worse than middle-class class warriors who believe that bourgeois ideology is somehow “not ideology”. To descend into ideology is, for them, left wing, subversive, political and wrong. To challenge, to think critically, to deabte is wrong. Fucking sanctimonious morons.
Speaking of sanctimonious morons, someone from wikipedia emailed me privately about some edits to the article on Darlington (NSW) which neighbours Redfern and may or may not include The Block. Hence the controversy. He emailed me with from on high, telling me that I might need to “grow as a person” because I “might not understand the aborignal connection to land”. “Maybe someday” I would come to understand him, but “until that day” I should “please practice tolerance as best you can. ” Of course his email ends with “Peace”.
Like all sanctimonious assholes, he wants to have the last word and leave everybody smiling, in awe.
I bet he didn’t see me coming.


You are the real moron. So, you love the State but you want to destroy it?!
Comment by Anonymous — November 1, 2005 @ 2:06 pm
No, I don’t love the state. Regulation is the only thing standing in between me and a lot of ruthless bastards (businesses) though. If they had their way, we would all be slaves. I’m as glad as I am resentful for the small margin by which I can really feel alive in this rotten society.
There is a lot of redefining of social relations to be done before the state can be smashed - or else it will simply leave a tremendous vacuum to be filled with any bizarre ideology. Like National Anarchism! Or Anarcho-capitalism (its real name is just plain ‘capitalism’).
Why even reply to an anonymous commentor? Being called a moron isn’t much more than I expect (I did use the word myself). But being misread by you is really annoying.
Try actually thinking for a moment before you react!
Comment by annaaniston — November 3, 2005 @ 11:25 pm
capitalizer intervened book punishes:squatting .
Comment by rome hotel marriott kansas city — April 18, 2006 @ 8:09 pm
Ok, that last comment is clearly SPAM, but I kinda like what it has to say.
Call me crazy.
Comment by Anna Aniston — April 19, 2006 @ 1:17 am
“Employers already enjoy so many freedoms that as a working class anarchist, I’m thankful to have a state to protect my last shreds of dignity (even though I’d love to be smashing that state into pieces).”
This cannot be accurate, the state is importing immigrants to replace you in the work force, split the working class along ethnic and language barriers, depress wages, and bust unions. Really you have no idea what you’re talking about. You are defending the right of the ruling class to do this. Every group of people is different just as every ethnic group is different. I prefer to live with people like me. If you don’t prefer that that’s OK, thats your right to as you choose, as a National Anarchist I defend you that right, however, don’t you dare to deny me my rights to determine who me and my family must live with accept as countrymen.
BANA
Comment by BANA — December 19, 2007 @ 7:03 pm